PRAC 6541 Week 5 Assignment: Journal Entry 2

JOURNAL ENTRY #2

Critical reflection of your growth and development during your practicum experience in a clinical setting has the benefit of helping you identify opportunities for improvement in your clinical skills while also recognizing your clinical strengths and successes.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PRAC 6541 Week 5 Assignment: Journal Entry 2 HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

This week, you will write a Journal Entry reflecting on your clinical strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Journal Entry (2–3 pages): Based on your experience,

Describe an interesting case or a case that you have never seen before. Explain what you found challenging.

Explain what you would do differently from your Preceptor. Explain the cultural differences you found challenging.

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

Complete your Journal Entry #2 Assignment.

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK5Journal2+last name+first
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for

Criteria	Ratings						Pts
Assimilation and Synthesis: Content Reflection	50 to >49.0 pts Excellent Reflection demonstrates a high level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Insightful and relevant connections are made through contextual explanations and examples.	49 to >39.0 pts Good Reflection demonstrates a moderate level of critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Connections are made through explanations and/or examples.		39 to >30.0 pts Fair Reflection demonstrates minimal critical thinking in applying and integrating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, and/or discussions. Minimal connections are made through explanations and/or examples.		30 to >0 pts Poor Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and resources, and/or assignments	50 pts
Assimilation and Synthesis: Personal Growth	30 to >29.0 pts Excellent Expresses solid evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates substantial personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences, well- developed insights, and significant depth in awareness and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.	29 to >19.0 pts Good Expresses moderate evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences, insights, and challenges. There is mention of the future implications of student’s current experience.	19 to >9.0 pts Fair Expresses minimal evidence of reflection on own work. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through limited or simplistic inferences made, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of future implications of student’s current experience.		9 to >0 pts Poor Expresses inadequate evidence of reflection on own work. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrate an impersonal experience. Lacks personal insights, challenges, inferences, and/or future implications are overlooked.		30 pts

Criteria	Ratings							Pts

Written Expression and Formatting	15 to >14.0 pts Excellent Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.		14 to >10.0 pts Good Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.		10 to >5.0 pts Fair Average writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.		5 to >0 pts Poor Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.	15 pts
APA	5 to >4.0 pts Excellent No APA errors	4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains 1-2 APA errors		3 to >1.0 pts Fair Contains 3-5 APA errors		1 to >0 pts Poor Contains > 5 APA errors		5 pts
Total Points: 100

PRAC 6541 Week 5 Assignment: Journal Entry 2