NURS 8201 WEEK 3 DISCUSSION: Have you ever watched a commercial that touts four out of five doctors recommend a particular product? Have you ever wondered how the company is able to make such claims? These types of claims are created using the research method of sampling. Sampling, involves selecting a group of people, events, behaviors, or other elements with which to conduct a study (Gray & Grove, 2020)
NURS 8201 WEEK 3 DISCUSSION: Have you ever watched a commercial that touts four out of five doctors recommend a particular product? Have you ever wondered how the company is able to make such claims? These types of claims are created using the research method of sampling. Sampling, involves selecting a group of people, events, behaviors, or other elements with which to conduct a study (Gray & Grove, 2020)
WEEK 3 DISCUSSION: SAMPLING
Have you ever watched a commercial that touts “four out of five doctors recommend a particular product”? Have you ever wondered how the company is able to make such claims? These types of claims are created using the research method of sampling. Sampling, “involves selecting a group of people, events, behaviors, or other elements with which to conduct a study” (Gray & Grove, 2020).
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 8201 WEEK 3 DISCUSSION: Have you ever watched a commercial that touts four out of five doctors recommend a particular product? Have you ever wondered how the company is able to make such claims? These types of claims are created using the research method of sampling. Sampling, involves selecting a group of people, events, behaviors, or other elements with which to conduct a study (Gray & Grove, 2020) HERE
Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!
There are different sampling methods and techniques, with ranging validity outcomes. Therefore, it is important to determine the technique that is most valid. Much of the outcome will be dependent on the particular group sampled (or the population), so a sampling plan will be integral before sampling occurs.
For this Discussion, reflect on the population in your area of practice. Consider the most appropriate use for this population and potential challenges that may affect sampling in this population. Then, think about how you might address these challenges and what strategies you might implement. How might a different population yield similar or conflicting results?
Reference: Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
WEEK 3: LEARNING RESOURCES
Required Readings
Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier.
Chapter 15, “Sampling” (pp. 410–449)
Chapter 20, “Collecting and Managing Data” (pp. 607–634)
Bruce, N., Pope, D., & Stanistreet, D. (2018). Quantitative methods for health research :Links to an external site. A practical interactive guide to epidemiology and statistics (2nd ed.). Wiley.
TO PREPARE:
Review the Learning Resources for this week and reflect on a population in your area of practice. How might you sample this population, and what challenges might you experience? Consider the use of strategies, or perhaps a different population, to mitigate these challenges.
After considering the sampling of a specific population, consider the importance of data collection. How might sampling be used in research, and what benefits might be derived from sampling in a study? Conversely, consider how a different approach might be useful.
BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 3
Post an explanation of the researchable populations that may be present in your area of practice. Describe which would be most appropriate for use in your research study and explain why. Then, describe the challenges of obtaining a sample from this population. How might you address those challenges? Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to also include the approach you would recommend to collect data from the sample that you described. Provide a rationale for the approach that you choose based on this week’s Learning Resources.
BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 3
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days in one of the following ways:
Provide additional strategies for addressing challenges to obtaining a sample from the identified population.
Suggest a different population that may be appropriate for addressing the research problem.
Summarize the strengths of the data collection method identified in the post.
Share any problems or concerns over the identified data collection method.
Suggest an alternative data collection method and provide your rationale.
NURS_8201_Week3_Discussion_Rubric
NURS_8201_Week3_Discussion_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current scholarly sources.
44 to >39.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s). Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current scholarly sources. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three current scholarly sources that are correctly cited and formatted.
39 to >34.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Responds to most of the Discussion question(s). Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three scholarly sources that are correctly cited and formatted.
34 to >30.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Supported by fewer than two scholarly sources that are correctly cited and formatted.
30 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Does not respond to the Discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no scholarly sources.
44 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Writing
6 to >5.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Written clearly and concisely. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Response is effectively written in Standard Academic English.
5 to >4.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Written clearly and concisely. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. Response is effectively written in Standard Academic English.
4 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Written somewhat clearly and concisely. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. Edits are needed to follow standards for Standard Academic English.
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. Does not follow Standard Academic English for most of the post.
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Timely and full participation
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts main Discussion by due date.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Meets requirements for full participation. … Posts main Discussion by due date.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Posts main Discussion by due date.
6 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not post main Discussion by due date.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with scholarly sources.
9 to >8.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. Uses scholarly sources to support ideas. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. Uses scholarly sources to support ideas. Demonstrates a beginning synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 8201 WEEK 3 DISCUSSION: Have you ever watched a commercial that touts four out of five doctors recommend a particular product? Have you ever wondered how the company is able to make such claims? These types of claims are created using the research method of sampling. Sampling, involves selecting a group of people, events, behaviors, or other elements with which to conduct a study (Gray & Grove, 2020) HERE
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Minimal or no scholarly sources provided.
6 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. No sources.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Writing
6 to >5.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions is fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more scholarly sources. Response is effectively written in Standard Academic English.
5 to >4.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions is mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Response is written in Academic English.
4 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions is minimally addressed, if posed. Few or no scholarly sources are cited.
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions is missing. No scholarly sources are cited.
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Timely and full participation
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts by due date.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Meets reuirements for full participation. … Posts by due date.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Posts by due date.
2 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not post by due date.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with scholarly sources.
9 to >8.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. Uses scholarly sources to support ideas. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. Uses scholarly sources to support ideas. Demonstrates a beginning synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Scholarly sources are correctly cited and formatted.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Minimal or no scholarly sources provided.
6 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. No sources.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Writing
6 to >5.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions is fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more scholarly sources. Response is effectively written in Standard Academic English.
5 to >4.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions is mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few at least two scholarly sources…. Response is written in Standard Academic English.
4 to >3.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions is minimally addressed, if posed. Few or no scholarly sources are cited.
3 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions is missing. No scholarly sources are cited.
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Timely and full participation
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Posts by due date.
2 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date.
5 pts
Total Points: 100