NURS 6501 Module 2 Assignment: Cardiopulmonary and Cardiovascular Physiologic Mechanisms Case Study Analysis

To prepare:

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study scenario for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

The Assignment (1- to 2-page case study analysis)

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:

The factors that affect fertility (STDs).

Why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID.

Why prostatitis and infection happens. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 6501 Module 2 Assignment: Cardiopulmonary and Cardiovascular Physiologic Mechanisms Case Study Analysis
HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

scenario:

65-year-old man presents to primary care center with a 5-day history of urinary dribbling, low back pain, peroneal pain, myalgias, and fevers with chills. He reports one episode of urinary incontinence this week. He denies any hematuria. Urinalysis with positive nitrites and trace bacteria. Patient has a history of a recent UTI. He also reports that his prostate has been enlarged and he had a recent transurethral surgery. Vital signs T 103.0 F, pulse 120, respirations 26.

Learning Resources:

Review the following Video Resources and Content Pages in the Lecturio Platform by clicking button below labeled Load Week 10: Learning Resources in a new window.

Sexually Transmitted Infections: Drips/Discharges, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease and Trichomonas Vaginalis (10:10 min)

Urethritis: Definition and Pathology (6:15 min)

Syphilis – Definition and Pathology (4:54 min)

Candidiasis (2:12 min)

Genital Warts (Condyloma Acuminatum): Pathology, Signs & Symptoms (3:01 min)

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV): Definition and Pathology (9:33 min)

Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) (1:54 min)

Prostatitis (Prostate Infection): Types (5:02 min)

Epididymitis (Emergency Medicine): 7:05 min

Introduction to Male Reproductive Pathology (4:02 min)

Diagnoses of Reproductive Hormone Disorders – Reproductive Pathology (10:38 min)

Female Factor Infertility (Nursing) (10:36 min)

Male Factor Infertility (Nursing) (4:00 min)

(Will upload lecturio username and password)

Supplemental Resources:

Note: These readings are intended to serve as supplementary to the Lecturio content provided in this course. Please refer/review these supplementary resources should you need help in reinforcing concepts and in preparation for completing this week’s Assessments.

McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

Chapter 24: Structure and Function of the Reproductive Systems (stop at Tests of reproductive function); Summary Review

Chapter 25: Alterations of the Female Reproductive System (stop at Organ prolapse); pp. 787–788 (start at Impaired fertility) (stop at Disorders of the female breast); Summary Review

Chapter 26: Alterations of the Male Reproductive System (stop at Hormone levels); Summary Review

Chapter 27: Sexually Transmitted Infections, including Summary Review

Low, N. & Broutet N. J. (2017). Sexually transmitted infections – Research priorities for new challengesLinks to an external site.. PLoS Medicine, (12), e1002481

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The sample paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templatesLinks to an external site.). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

Please follow the rubrics:

NURS_6501_Week 10_Case Study_Assignment_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis, examining the patient symptoms presented in the case study. Be sure to address the following as it relates to the case you were assigned (omit section that does not pertain to your case, faculty will give full points for that section): Explain the factors that affect fertility (STDs)

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response describes the patient symptoms. … The response includes accurate, explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

24 to >21.0 pts

Fair

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague or inaccurate. … The response includes explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, with explanations that are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.

21 to >0 pts

Poor

The response describes the patient symptoms in a manner that is vague and inaccurate, or the description is missing. … The response does not include explanations of the processes related to women’s and men’s health, or the explanations are vague or based on inappropriate evidence/research.
30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain why inflammatory markers rise in STD/PID

30 to >27.0 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific analysis of the concepts and principles of pathophysiology across the life span and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

27 to >24.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

24 to >21.0 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.

21 to >0 pts

Poor

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate or missing evidence/research.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain why prostatitis and infection happen. Also explain the causes of systemic reaction.

25 to >22.5 pts

Excellent

The response includes an accurate, complete, detailed, and specific explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

22.5 to >20.0 pts

Good

The response includes an accurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient and is supported by evidence and/or research, as appropriate, to support the explanation.

20 to >17.5 pts

Fair

The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of how the highlighted processes interact to affect the patient, with explanations that are based on inappropriate evidence/research.

17.5 to >0 pts

Poor

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time….The purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

NURS 6501 Module 2 Assignment: Cardiopulmonary and Cardiovascular Physiologic Mechanisms Case Study Analysis