NUR 590 Assignment: Evidence Based Project Proposal Evaluation Plan

Assessment Description

In 750-1,000 words, develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project proposal. You will use the evaluation plan in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:

Discuss the expected outcomes for your evidence-based practice project proposal.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 590 Assignment: Evidence Based Project Proposal Evaluation Plan HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

Review the various data collection tools associated with your selected research design and select one data collection tool that would be effective for your research design. Explain how this tool is valid, reliable, and applicable.

Select a statistical test for your project and explain why it is best suited for the tool you choose.

Describe what methods you will apply to your data collection tool and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool you selected.

Propose strategies that will be taken if outcomes do not provide positive or expected results.

Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total120 points

Criterion

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3. 3: Satisfactory

4. 4: Good

5. 5: Excellent

Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal

Expected Outcomes for Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal
0 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are not discussed.

11.52 points

Some expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are only partially outlined.

12.67 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are summarized. More information is needed.
13.25 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

14.4 points

Expected outcomes for the evidence-based practice project proposal are discussed. Thorough explanations and strong supporting research are provided.

Data Collection Tools

Data Collection Tools
0 points

A data collection tool is not discussed.

9.6 points

A data collection tool is selected, but it is unclear why the tool would be effective for the research design. A valid, reliable, and applicable explanation for the tool is incomplete.
10.56 points

A data collection tool is selected, and a summary for why the tool would be effective for the research design is presented. A general explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable, but more information and support are needed.
11.04 points

A data collection tool is selected, and an explanation for why the tool would be effective for the research design is presented. An explanation for the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

12 points

A data collection tool is selected and a well-supported explanation for why the tool is valid, reliable, and applicable and would be effective for the research design is presented.

Statistical Test for Project

Statistical Test for Project
0 points

A statistical test is omitted.
9.6 points

A statistical test is selected, but it is unclear why the test is best suited for the tool.

10.56 points

A statistical test is selected, and a summary for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. More information or support is needed.

11.04 points

A statistical test is selected, and an explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
12 points

A statistical test is selected, and a well-supported explanation for why the test is best suited for the tool is clearly presented.

Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool

Methods Applied to Data Collection Tool
0 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool are not discussed.
9.6 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection tool partially discussed. It is unclear how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected.

10.56 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection are outlined. A summary of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. More information or support is needed.
11.04 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection are discussed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
12 points

Methods that will be applied to the data collection are thoroughly discussed. A discussion of how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the tool selected are presented.

Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive

Strategies for Outcomes That Are Nonpositive
0 points

Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are not discussed.
11.52 points

Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are incomplete.
12.67 points

General strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. More information and support are needed.
13.25 points

Strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.
14.4 points

Clear and well-supported strategies for nonpositive outcomes are presented.

Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution

Plans to Maintain, Extend, Revise, and Discontinue Proposed Solution
0 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 590 Assignment: Evidence Based Project Proposal Evaluation Plan HERE

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are not discussed.
10.56 points

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are incomplete.

11.62 points

General plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. More information and support are needed.
12.14 points

Plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

13.2 points

Detailed and well-supported plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation are presented.

Required Sources

Required Sources
0 points

Sources are not included.
4.8 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

5.28 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
5.52 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
6 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis Development and Purpose
0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
6.72 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
7.39 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

7.73 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

8.4 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction

Argument Logic and Construction
0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

7.68 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

8.45 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
8.83 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
9.6 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
4.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
5.28 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
5.52 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
6 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
4.8 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
5.28 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
5.52 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

6 points

All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
0 points

Sources are not documented.
4.8 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
5.28 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

5.52 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

6 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

NUR 590 Assignment: Evidence Based Project Proposal Evaluation Plan