NRS 493 Assignment: Literature Evaluation Table

NRS 493 Assignment: Literature Evaluation Table

NRS 493 Assignment: Literature Evaluation Table

Literature Evaluation Table

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences): Diabetes management is the topic of interest. This capstone project aims to identify and synthesize evidence about the effectiveness of patient, provider, and health system interventions to improve diabetes care among socially disadvantaged populations especially but not exclusive in-home health setting NRS-493 Literature Evaluation Table.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE  NRS 493 Assignment: Literature Evaluation Table HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and 

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

 

Dehnabi, A., Navipour, H., Radsepehr, H., & Al- Reza Tadayonfar, M. https://doi.org/10.32598/jccnc.3.4.251

White, R et al. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05617-z)

Azami, G et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4930157 Hildebrand et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.009
Article Title and Year Published 

 

2017 – Effect of discharge planning on metabolic factors in type 2 diabetic patients 2019 – The partnership to improve diabetes education trial: A cluster randomized trial addressing health 

communication in diabetes care

2017-Effect of a nurse-led diabetes self-management education program and glycosylated hemoglobin among adults with type 2 diabetes 2020- Effect of diabetes self-management education on glycemic control in Latino adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative) 

 

What is the effect of discharge planning program on metabolic factors in type 2 diabetic patient? 

 

Discharge planning is an important principle in patients’ need analysis during hospitalization in order to determine the continuity of care after discharge

 

No defined research question but comparison/evaluation of two distinct approaches to improve care for vulnerable patients. Nurse-led diabetes self-management education intervention compared with usual care would result in improvement in hemoglobin A1C 

 

The nurse lit diabetes self-management education intervention will improve lipid profile blood pressure, body weight, self-management behavior self-efficiency quality of life, depression, and social support

In Latino adults with T2DM, does DSME improve glycemic control?
Purposes/Aim of Study Evaluating the effect of a nursing process based proposed discharge program on controlling the metabolic factors of patients with type 2 diabetes Translating prior health communication research to the community level and inform models of care
targeting glycemic control in vulnerable populations
To investigate the effectiveness of a nurse-led diabetes self-management education on glycosylated hemoglobin A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the evidence of the effectiveness of DSME interventions on glycemic control and research gaps in the adult Latino population with T2DM across all settings 

An appraisal of systematic reviews and meta-analyses literature to assess the effects of DSME in adults with T2DM

Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) 

 

Quasi- experimental research Cluster randomized controlled trial NRS-493 Literature Evaluation Table Randomized controlled trial Randomized controlled trial and Quasi- experimental research
Setting/Sample 

 

70 participants with diabetes type II, ages 40-60 years, both male and female who were patients at Vasei Hospital, Sabzevar-Iran 410 enrolled type II diabetic patients, 364 included in analysis across 10 unblinded, randomly assigned safety net clinics in Middle TN. Median age was 51 Randomized 142 type II diabetic patients in hospital-based clinic located within a teaching hospital in Ilam city, Iran 23 studies used
Methods: Intervention/Instruments 

 

 

Check list, training/education sessions, medical measurement devices, sphygmomanometer, and blood test to
measure metabolic factors such as glycosylated hemoglobin, triglyceride, high- density lipoprotein,
systolic and diastolic blood pressure and waist circumference

A literacy-sensitive, provider-focused, 

health communication intervention (PRIDE; 5 clinics)

 

Standard diabetes education (5 clinics)

 

Diabetes Numeracy Test, Short Test of

Functional Health Literacy in Adults, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities, Personal Diabetes Questionnaire, Adherence to Refills and Medication Scale, Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, Perceived Diabetes Self-

Management Scale

 

Clinical measures such as A1c, blood pressure, and BMI

Booklet consisting of education on diet, physical activity, medication, monitoring of blood glucose, foot care, healthy living with diabetes, weekly group based educational session, follow up telephone call, viewing four 10-minute movie clips, questionnaire 

 

Blood samples for fasting hemoglobin A1C, total triglyceride, total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein, blood pressure, quality of life, depression social support

A systematic search was conducted of Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library and Web of Science 

 

Cochrane risk of bias tool was utilized to assess the methodological quality of studies

Analysis 

 

Data was analyzed by pair t test,
independent t-test, and chi-square using SPSS-PC (V.20) NRS-493 Literature Evaluation Table
Adjusted mixed effects regression models were used to examine the comparative effectiveness of each approach to care 

 

Linear mixed models for the continuous outcome measures

Categorical variables with frequencies and proportions

are used for summaries

 

χ2 tests for unadjusted comparison

 

All analyses were

conducted with R software version 3.3.0

 

All data were analyzed using SPSS Software 

Statistical significance was reported at the 0.05 alpha level, with two-tailed P values. Values are expressed as mean ± SD

or n (%).

Comparisons of baseline data between two experimental groups were made using Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney

 

U test for continuous variables based on their normality, and the Chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables

 

Main analyses were made on an intention to treat basis using repeated measures ANOVA.

Data were analyzed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, version 3.1 software 

 

Sandard deviations were calculated for studies where a change in A1C was presented with confidence intervals or standard errors

 

Random-effects model was utilized to estimate the effect size of DSME on A1C due to the moderate heterogeneity between the studies

Key Findings 

 

Statistically significant difference in the mean systolic blood pressure,
glycosylated hemoglobin and triglyceride between the intervention and control groups.Reduction of hemoglobin glycosylated levels in type II diabetic patients. 

 

No difference in Mean diastolic blood pressure or waist size

Adequate health literacy was seen in 83% but numeracy deficits were common 

 

The PRIDE trial failed to demonstrate superiority at lowering A1C relative to a rigorously delivered standard national diabetes-based education

 

Both programs had significant impact on glycemic control and behavioral outcomes

 

The PRIDE intervention
appeared to have modest evidence for greater sustainability of within-group impact on glycemic control than the other at 24 months

 

Participants in the intervention group showed 

significant improvements in glycemic control, blood pressure, body weight, efficacy expectation, outcome expectation,

self-management behaviors, and social support compared

with patients in the control group

 

These improvements were

sustained over a 24-week follow-up period.

 

There were no significant differences between groups in their lipid profiles

Culturally tailored DSME programs reduce A1C levels in adult Latinos 

 

On average, people assigned to DSME experienced 0.24 standard deviations lower in A1C value compared to those in usual care

 

Duration of DSME intervention was evaluated by the length of time; studies that were less than six months demonstrated the most improvement

 

Integrating ongoing support to the educational format may boost and maintain self-management behaviors that improve glycemic control

 

Integration of culturally tailored interventions for Latinos must be considered cautiously given the variation in tradition in each subculture

Recommendations 

 

There is positive impact of discharge planning on the outcomes of post- discharge illness and the need to apply it in practice 

 

Further studies are recommended according to the limitations

Continued translational work to improve care delivery is needed Implementation of a program that emphasizes collaborative learning 

 

Further research, with extended contact time and longer follow-up, to show if our intervention has long-term effects

Further studies to identify Latino subcultures to determine unique intervention that positively effect glycemic control across diverse population
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project 

 

This article presents healthcare intervention inform of discharge planning to improve diabetic care This article presents evidenced based method of community health intervention program that could be at improving glycemic control and behavioral outcome in diabetic patient This article presents evidence that nurse lead diabetic education is effective which is one of the goals for this capstone project This articles present evidence that culturally tailored diabetes self-management education program is also necessary for this project

 

Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and 

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

Whitehouse et al. 10.3928/19404921-20180223-02 McElfish et al. 

doi: 10.2337/dc18-1985

Chakraborty et al. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108363

Robbins, T et al. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2019.01.004

Article Title and Year Published 

 

2018- Supporting transitions in care for older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity 2019 – Comparative effectiveness and maintenance of diabetes self-management education intervention for Marshallese patients with type 2 diabetes: Arandomized controlled trial 2021 – The effectiveness of in-hospital interventions on reducing hospital length of stay and readmission of patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A systematic review 2019 – Risk factors for readmission of inpatients with diabetes: A systematic review
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative) 

 

Does inpatient diabetes education and homecare helps improve rates of rehospitalization and hemoglobin A1C during care transitions from hospital to home Adapted DSME intervention would result in greater reductions of HbA1c than would the standard DSME intervention. Is hospital-based multidisciplinary interventions for managing patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus effective? What are the currently understood risk factors for readmission of people with diabetes?
Purposes/Aim of Study The aim of the study was to compare the effects of inpatient diabetes self-management education (DSME) plus home care, inpatient DSM only, usual care on hospital, readmission rates and glycemic control for hospitalized older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of a culturally adapted family-model DSME intervention (adapted DSME) compared with that of a standard DSME intervention among Marshallese with type 2 diabetes in Arkansas NRS-493 Literature Evaluation Table NRS-493 Literature Evaluation TableThis aimed to assess the effectiveness of multifaceted in-hospital interventions for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on hospital readmission, hospital length of stay (LOS), and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) The aim is to identify, systematically, known risk factors for readmission to hospital, amongst people with diabetes. The intention of the study is to cast a ‘broad net’, ascertaining all known risk factors, irrespective of whether identified for a specific subset of patients (such as emergency admissions only) or generalized populations of all inpatients with diabetes
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) 

 

Longitudinal study Randomized controlled trial Randomized controlled trial, non-randomized quasi-experimental studies 

in a systematic review

Prospective pilot studies; Prospective cohort studies; 

Case control study; Qualitative study; Systematic review; Narrative review

Setting/Sample 

 

A total of 180 individuals 60 or older were evaluated and enrolled based on convenience sampling n 3 different groups; on medical unit or emergency department unit, inpatient education alone, inpatient+ home care education, and usual patient without diabetic education. Patient were recruited during any medical admission to urban academic medical center in the mid-Atlantic U. S Randomized 240 participant with type 2 diabetes status in Washington County and Benton County in northwest Arkansas 

Adapted DSME delivered in participants homes

Standard DSME delivered at a community center near Marshallese community

Nine studies. Most studies comprised of a wide range of intervention components and outcome measure 

Diabetic patient 18 years or older admitted to hospital

Studies were mostly Asia, America, and Europe

83 studies were selected for inclusion, predominantly from the United States 

 

This research topic was identified as an area of priority for people with diabetes. This was both through the Diabetes Voices Programme, operated by Diabetes UK

 

Methods: Intervention/Instruments 

 

Two APRNs who were also certified diabetes educators provided patient-centered, individualized inpatient diabetes education 

follow-up phone call within 24 to 48 hours of hospital discharge and again at 30 days following hospital discharge by a project manager

baseline enrollment questions

Standard DSME included 10 h of content delivered over a 6-week period and covered eight core elements: healthy eating, being active, glucose monitoring, understanding blood glucose and taking medications, problem solving, reducing risks and healthy coping, mitigating complications of diabetes, and goal setting 

 

Adapted DSME included 10 h of content delivered over an 8-week period and covered the same eight core elements of DSME. NRS-493 Literature Evaluation Table

Use of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Emcare, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Google Scholar search database from 2007 to current date and restricted to English 

 

Use of PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design) framework

 

JBI Critical Appraisal Instruments relevant to RCTs, and quasi-experimental studies

Systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA standards 

 

Literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE & SCOPUS databases

 

Quality assessment for each of the selected papers was performed against pre-determined standards

 

 

Analysis 

 

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23 Power calculations accounted for model covariates by specifying the assumed R2 between the main independent variable and preplanned adjustment variables. Power was calculated by using PASS 15 

 

0.5% (5.5 mmol/mol) change in HbA1c is considered to be a clinically important difference

Findings are reported in narrative form, supported by figures and tables. Raw data as reported in the studies and contextual information are included A narrative summary of risk factors identified was extracted, with subsequent thematic grouping of the risk factors 

 

 

Key Findings 

 

Content of DSME programs needs to be adapted to older adults with different degrees of independence and comorbidity 

 

It is important for health care providers to ensure that their patients understand key points for diabetes care during their hospital admission regardless of the length of time from diagnosis with diabetes

provide support for the development of recommendations for the type and site of effective educational interventions for older adults with T2DM and obesity

The overall benefits of patient education are clear

Participants receiving the adapted DSME showed significantly greater reductions in mean HbA1c than did those receiving the standard DSME immediately after and 12 months after the intervention 

 

finding supports the hypothesis that adapted DSME would produce greater reductions in mean HbA1c than occur with standard DSME

 

This study points to the potential effectiveness of mobilizing family members and cultural context in education about chronic disease self-management.

An in-hospital intervention for patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes can contribute to improvements in hospital LOS and HbA1c concentration 

 

The reduction in hospital LOS ranged from half a day (0.5) to 0.8 of a day. Improvements in HbA1c concentration levels across studies were clinically significant, ranging from a mean reduction of −1.1 (±2.2) mmol/L to −2.8 (±2.7) mmol/L

 

here was no overt benefit for hospital readmission and no evidence of the impact of HbA1c on hospital LOS and readmission

 

Common strategies towards the success of multidisciplinary interventions in reducing hospital LOS and HbA1c were a dedicated care team, hospital wide approach, quality improvement focus, insulin therapy, early short-term intensive program, transition to primary care physicians, and on-going outpatient follow-up for at least 6–12 months.

48 studies identified statistically significant risk factors for readmission 

 

20 studies identified risk factors in generalized populations of patients with diabetes

 

28 studies identified risk factors for specific sub-populations of patients with diabetes

 

Most commonly identified risk factors being co-morbidities, age, race, insurance type, sex.

 

A requirement for insulin was a widely reported risk factor either before admission, during admission or subsequent to discharge

 

This study identifies a number of key research priorities to better sup-port patients at discharge from hospital with diabetes

 

This is a valuable resource to patients, clinicians and academics looking to improve the process of inpatient discharge from hospital

Recommendations 

 

Determined type of education and setting that is most beneficial for hospitalized older adults with T2DM and obesity and if improvements in patient-centered outcomes can be measured over time. Further study to examine contributions of culturally adapted educational curriculum Enrollment of First Nations and ethnically diverse populations in these types of studies and addressing the social determinants of health Further work that will lead to introducing targeted personalized interventions, in order to improve the quality of care for provided for people with diabetes
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone 

 

This article highlights the need to incorporate age-appropriate educational material within this project NRS-493 Literature Evaluation Table  

The article emphasized the importance of diabetic education in the home and supporting the primary setting this capstone

This article is a level 1 research that presents intervention to reduce readmission and hospital LOS among DMT2 patients which a question posed to be addressed in in this project It is critical to identify risk factors that increases DMT2 morbidity/mortality in order to execute a secondary or tertiary intervention for these individuals and prevent readmission to the hospital