NRNP 6675 Week 10 Assignment: National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) Competencies
NRNP 6675 Week 10 Assignment: National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) Competencies
The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) has determined nine broad areas of core competence that apply to all nurse practitioners, regardless of specialty or patient population focus. NONPF created the first set of Nurse Practitioner Competencies in 1990; the most recent updates were incorporated in 2017. This course was designed to prepare you to synthesize knowledge gained throughout the program and to apply each of the nine core competencies within your selected areas of practice and your representative communities.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRNP 6675 Week 10 Assignment: National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) Competencies HERE
Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!
The nine areas of competency are:
Leadership
Quality
Practice Inquiry
Technology and Information Literacy
Policy
Health Delivery System
Ethics
Independent Practice
To Prepare
Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on the NONPF Core Competencies Content.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
Learning Resources
Required Readings
American Nurses Credentialing Center. (n.d.). Psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner (across the lifespan) certification
Links to an external site. (PMHNP-BC).
https://www.nursingworld.org/our-certifications/psychiatric-mental-health-nurse-practitioner/
Scroll to ANCC Study Aids – Free for sample test questions and study guides to help you prepare for your certification exam.
Buppert, C. (2021). Nurse practitioner’s business practice and legal guide
Links to an external site. (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chapter 12, “Lawmaking and Health Policy”
Chapter 14, “Standards of Care for Nurse Practitioner Practice”
Chapter 15, “Measuring Nurse Practitioner Performance”
The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties. (2017). Nurse practitioner core competencies
Links to an external site.. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.nonpf.org/resource/resmgr/competencies/20170516_NPCoreCompsContentF.pdf
The National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties. (n.d.). National organization of nurse practitioner faculties
Links to an external site.. https://www.nonpf.org/
Stewart, J. G., & DeNisco, S. M. (2019). Role development for the nurse practitioner (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Chapter 11, “Concepts of the Professional”
Chapter 12, “Health Policy and the Nurse Practitioner”
Chapter 14, “Mentoring”
Zakhari, R. (2021). The psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner certification review manual. Springer Publishing Company.
Chapter 1, “Preparing to Pass the Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Certification Exam” (for review as needed)
Chapter 16, “Practice Test”
Document: Career Planner Guide
Download Career Planner Guide
Required Media
APRN Central. (2019, October 27). Goal digger: Test taking strategies
Links to an external site. [Video].
YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=STAT1WpQgSM
DrRegisteredNurse. (2020, February 16). Test-taking strategies to pass the NCLEX in 75 questions part 1
Links to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81E3dAxrO2c
Walden Graduation and Next Steps
In this video, Dr. Judi Kuric discusses important topics related to the transition from coursework to advanced nursing practice.
Walden University. (2020). Test taking strategies: Preparation for your certification exam
Links to an external site. [Video]. https://event.on24.com/wcc/r/3640795/98D4198C2B42D16C50C4F0A5D13122B6?partnerref=fac2022
The Assignment
For each of the nine NONPF competencies, write one paragraph explaining how the program has prepared you to meet the competency (for a total of at least nine paragraphs). Then, propose how you plan to engage in social change in your community as a nurse practitioner. Finally, describe 1–2 legislative and/or advocacy activities in which your state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 7 of Week 10
Submit your Assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK10Assgn2_LastName_Firstinitial
Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
NRNP_6675_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric
NRNP_6675_Week10_Assignment2_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome For each of the nine NONPF competencies, write one paragraph explaining how the program has prepared you to meet it (for a total of at least nine paragraphs).
55 to >49.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies.
49 to >43.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Response clearly explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies.
43 to >38.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies or one of the competencies is not addressed.
38 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains how the MSN program has prepared the student to meet each of the nine NONPF competencies. Several of the competencies are not addressed or resposnse is missing.
55 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Propose and explain how you plan to engage in social change in your community as a nurse practitioner. Be specific and provide examples.
20 to >17.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Response clearly and thoroughly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided.
17 to >15.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Response clearly explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner. Specific examples are provided.
15 to >13.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner.
13 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NRNP 6675 Week 10 Assignment: National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF) Competencies HERE
Response vaguely and/or inaccurately explains a plan to engage in social change in a community as a nurse practitioner or response is missing.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Describe 1-2 legislative and advocacy activities that your state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.
10 to >8.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Response clearly and concisely describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.
8 to >7.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Response clearly describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.
7 to >6.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Response somewhat vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in.
6 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Response vaguely and/or inaccurately describes 1-2 legislative/advocacy activities that student’s state nurse practitioner organization(s) are involved in, or response is missing.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity…. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time…. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.
2 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time…. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Contains ≥ 5 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – The assignment follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts
Excellent 90%–100%
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good 80%–89%
Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 pts
Fair 70%–79%
Contains 3-4 APA format errors.
2 to >0 pts
Poor 0%–69%
Contains ≥ 5 APA format errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 100