NR505NP Week 7 Assignment: EBP Presentation

Purpose

Translating knowledge into practice establishes evidence-based practice (EBP) within the nursing profession. Nurse practitioners participate in the dissemination of research evidence to support the creation of practice interventions. The purpose of this assignment is to prepare students to disseminate evidence to support practice. Students will synthesize the information they have gathered during the course to formulate a presentation advocating for a practice change in relation to an area of interest to NP practice.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR505NP Week 7 Assignment: EBP Presentation HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO1: Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1,4)

CO2: Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve health outcome. (PO 1, 2)

CO3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth through a spirit of inquiry, scholarship, and service in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3, 4)

CO4: Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 5)

CO5: Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Due Date

Sun., 11:59pm MT Sunday

Submit your PowerPoint file to the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 7.

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 200 points.

Requirements

In Week 7, students will create a PowerPoint slide show with notes pages discussing their PICOT question, literature review, and recommendations for change. In Week 8, students will create a Kaltura recording of the presentation for the Peer Discussion thread.

Criteria for Content

Students will synthesize the information they have gathered during the course to formulate a presentation advocating for a practice change in relation to an area of interest to NP practice.

Creating a Professional PowerPoint PresentationLinks to an external site.Download Creating a Professional PowerPoint Presentation

In a PowerPoint Presentation, address the following.

Title Slide

Introduction (1 slide): Slide should identify concepts to be addressed and sections of the presentation. Include speaker’s notes that explain, in more detail, what will be covered.

Practice Issue (1-3 slides): Describe the area of interest and practice issue/problem related to NP practice selected in week 2. Explain why the issue/concern is important to nurse practitioner practice and its impact on health outcomes. Provide speaker notes. Provide scholarly references to support your ideas.

PICOT Question (1 slide): Provide the PICOT question developed in week 2. Describe each element of your PICOT question in one or two sentences, being sure to address all the following:

P-Population and problem – What is the nursing practice concern or problem and whom does it affect?

I–Intervention – What evidence-based solution for the problem would you like to apply?

C–Comparison – What is another solution for the problem? Note that this is typically the current practice, no intervention at all, or alternative solutions.

O–Outcome – Very specifically, how will you know that the intervention worked? Think about how you will measure the outcome.

T–Time frame – What is the Timeframe involved for the EBP initiative or the target date of completion?

Literature review (2-4 slides):Summarize the literature review completed in week 5. Discuss themes and special concerns. Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented.

Recommendations (3 slides):

Slide 1: Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

Slide 2: Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. Speaker’s notes add detail.

Slide 3: Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit, feasibility, and appropriateness as discussed by Dang and Dearholt (2018), Ch. 8. Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.

Conclusion: (1 slide)Slide provides summary points of presentation. Speaker’s notes provide final comments on the topic.

References: Reference elements provided in APA format, may use bullets. Hanging indents not required.

Preparing the Presentation

Submission Requirements

Application: Use Microsoft Power Point to create the presentation. Submit as a .ppt or .pptx file.

Length: The PowerPoint presentation should be between 9-13 total slides (excluding title and reference slides).

Speaker notes should be used and include in-text citations when applicable. Use the Notes Page view feature in PowerPoint to include speaker notes.

Submission: Submit the PowerPoint file to the Week 7 Dropbox.

Best Practices in Preparing the Presentation

The following are best practices in preparing this presentation:

Review directions thoroughly.

Follow submission requirements.

Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.

Follow rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation consistent with formal, scientific writing.

Review the Creating a Professional Presentation located in Course Resources.

Correctly cite and reference ideas and information that come from scholarly literature.

Abide by Chamberlain University academic integrity policy.

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT

Category
Points
%
Description

Introduction

(1 slide)

Introduction includes concepts to be addressed. Identify sections of the PowerPoint presentation. Speaker notes include details of what will be covered in the presentation.

Nursing Practice Issue/Problem

10%
Describes one specific issue or concern within the selected area of advanced practice nursing. Explanation of the impact of this issue or concern on health outcomes. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which validate the importance of the issue or concern.

*The nursing practice issue/problem description may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

PICOT question

20
10%
Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as:

P =

I =

C =

O =

T =

PICOT question =

Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements.

*The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

Literature Review

25%

Summarize the literature review completed in week 5. Discuss themes and special concerns. Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature. Provide speaker notes. Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented.

Recommendations Slide 1: Identify EBP change

10%

Recommendations Slide 2: Identify key stakeholders

10%

Slide 2: Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. Speaker’s notes add detail.

Recommendations Slide 3: Analyze fit, feasibility, and appropriateness
20
10%

Slide 3: Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit, feasibility, and appropriateness as discussed by Dang and Dearholt (2018), ch. 8. Speaker’s notes add detail.

*Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.

Conclusion

(1 slide)
10
5%
Summarize key information presented in PowerPoint presentation. Provide speaker notes.
170

85%

Total CONTENT Points= 170 pts

ASSIGNMENT FORMAT

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR505NP Week 7 Assignment: EBP Presentation HERE

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

17 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Includes the PICOT question in the standard PICOT question format with each letter separately, such as: o P = o I = o C = o O = o T = o PICOT question = • Speaker notes accurately and clearly describe each of the PICOT elements. *The PICOT question and explanation may be reused from the Week 2 worksheet
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review

50 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 • Discuss themes and special concerns. • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented

46 pts

Very Good

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 • Discuss themes and special concerns. • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature. • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented

42 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 • Discuss themes and special concerns. • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented

25 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Summarize the literature review completed in week 5 • Discuss themes and special concerns • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Summarize the literature review completed in week . • Discuss themes and special concerns • Discuss any unique insight or perspective offered from the literature • Provide speaker notes • Speaker notes and/or slides include citations from scholarly nursing literature which support the assertions presented

50 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations: Identify EBP Change

20 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

18 pts

Very Good

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

17 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Identify the evidence-based recommendation for the identified practice change. • Speaker’s notes should fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. • Provide support from scholarly references to support the recommendation.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations: Key Stakeholders

20 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail

18 pts

Very Good

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail.

17 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: • Identify the key stakeholders impacted by the recommended change. • Speaker’s notes add detail.
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecommendations: Fit, Feasibility, Appropriateness

20 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes all of the following elements: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.

18 pts

Very Good

Presentation of information is superficial in places and includes all of the following elements: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.

17 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated and includes all of the following elements: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations or is missing the following: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Presentation of information in two or more of the following elements fail to meet expectations or are missing the following: Using Dang and Dearholt (2018, chapter 8): • Analyze the recommendation in terms of fit • Analyze the recommendation in terms of feasibility • Analyze the recommendation in terms of appropriateness • Speaker’s notes add detail. *Note: information regarding stakeholders, fit, feasibility, and appropriateness may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

10 pts

Excellent

Presentation of information is comprehensive and concise and includes the following element: • Summarizes key information presented in PowerPoint presentation • Provides speaker notes

9 pts

Very Good

Presentation of information is adequate and includes the following element: • Summarizes key information presented in PowerPoint presentation • Provides speaker notes

8 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation of information is minimally demonstrated in the following element: • Summarizes key information presented in PowerPoint presentation • Provides speaker notes

5 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation of information in the following element is missing: • Summarizes key information presented in PowerPoint presentation Provides speaker notes

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Conclusion is not provided

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format

10 pts

Excellent

APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the following: • In-text citations are used and provided on the slide or within the speaker notes. • Slides, speaker notes, and reference elements are consistent with current APA format. May use bullets on the reference slide. Hanging indents not required. One deduction for each type of APA format error. 0 to 1 APA error is present

9 pts

Very Good

8 pts

Satisfactory

5 pts

Needs Improvement

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation of Slides
10 pts

Excellent

PowerPoint presentation addresses all of the following elements: • Title slide • Reference slide(s) • Slides are professional in appearance and tone • Slides are balanced spatially, including words and graphics • Color is effective • Presentation is 9-13 total slides

9 pts

Very Good

PowerPoint presentation does not address one of the following elements: • Title slide • Reference slide(s) • Slides are professional in appearance and tone • Slides are balanced spatially, including words and graphics • Color is effective • Presentation is 9-13 total slides

8 pts

Satisfactory

PowerPoint presentation does not address two of the following elements: • Title slide • Reference slide(s) • Slides are professional in appearance and tone • Slides are balanced spatially, including words and graphics • Color is effective • Presentation is 9-13 total slides

5 pts

Needs Improvement

PowerPoint does not address three or more of the following elements: • Title slide • Reference slide(s) • Slides are professional in appearance and tone • Slides are balanced spatially, including words and graphics • Color is effective • Presentation is 9-13 total slides

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

PowerPoint is unprofessional and does not include any elements

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics

10 pts

Excellent

1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual

9 pts

Very Good

3–4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual

8 pts

Satisfactory

5–6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual

5 pts

Needs Improvement

7–8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual
10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions
0 pts

0 Points Deducted

0 pts

20 Points Deducted

0 pts

Total Points: 200

NR505NP Week 7 Assignment: EBP Presentation