DNP 830 Week 3 Part 1 Assignment: Working With Descriptive Statistics
DNP 830 Week 3 Part 1 Assignment: Working With Descriptive Statistics
Assessment Description
This course helps you develop a basic understanding of statistics. This course addresses two distinct types, descriptive and inferential statistics. In this assignment, you will use a software program that makes it easy to analyze data using specific tests. This assignment will give you practice with mean, median, mode, range, and standard deviation.
General Requirements:
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE DNP 830 Week 3 Part 1 Assignment: Working With Descriptive Statistics HERE
Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Refer to the “Downloading and Installing SPSS for Doctoral Students” resource, located in the Class Resources, to download SPSS to your computer prior to beginning this assignment.
View the “Working with Descriptive Statistics” tutorial, located in the DNP-830A folder of the DNP PI Workspace.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.
Directions:
After you have downloaded the SPSS program to your computer, completed the assigned readings, and viewed the assigned videos, use the data provided in the topic Resources, “HCUP State Inpatient Databases (SID) File Composition – Number of Discharges by Year,” and appropriate statistics to address the following:
Determine the statistics for discharges in 2018 as follows: Mean, Median, Mode, Standard Deviation, Minimum, and Maximum.
Describe the data distribution using the bell curve as follows: Create a histogram with discharges (axis X) and frequencies (axis Y).
SPSS Output
Open SPSS and open a new database.
Go to the Variable View.
In the first row, label the name as State. Enter State as the Label Field. In the Values drop down, enter numerical values for each state label (e.g., 1 = AK, 2 = AR, etc.).
In rows 2 through 10, label the name as Year_2012 through Year_2020. Enter the applicable year (e.g., 2012, 2013, etc.) in the Label Field.
Go to the Data View and enter the data. Use numbers for the states in the first column. Enter the discharges for each applicable year (2012 – 2020) and align to the respective state. Save this data set. You will use this same data set in Topic 4.
Go to the menu and click Analyze. Click Descriptive Statistics, then click Frequencies, and add Year_2018 to the field. Click Statistics and click mean, median, mode, std. deviation, minimum, and maximum. Click continue. Click Charts and select Histograms. Click show normal curve on histogram. Click continue. Click OK. Review and save the Output.
Summary
Create a histogram of the discharges graphed. Determine if the data are normally distributed or skewed according to the bell curve. Write a 250-500-word summary of your analysis and results. Attach the histogram and the SPSS statistical output to the appendices of your paper.
Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours:
It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the References section of your paper:
Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-830A
I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed and logged (NUMBER OF) clock minutes/hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor before the end of the course.
Working With Descriptive Statistics – Rubric
LISTGRID
PRINT TO PDF
Rubric Criteria
Total110 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Insufficient
3. Approaching
4. Acceptable
5. Target
Summary of Analysis and Results
Summary of Analysis and Results
0 points
A summary of the results is not included.
17.6 points
A summary of the results is incomplete. There are significant inaccuracies.
19.36 points
A summary of the analysis and results is included. Some aspects are unclear. There are minor inaccuracies.
20.24 points
A summary of the analysis and results is complete and adequate.
22 points
A summary of the analysis and results is accurate and detailed.
Histogram of Statistical Analysis
Histogram of Statistical Analysis
0 points
A histogram of the discharges graphed is not included.
13.2 points
A histogram of the discharges graphed is incomplete or incorrect. The histogram is included but is not attached in the appendices of the paper.
14.52 points
NA
15.18 points
NA
16.5 points
A histogram of the discharges graphed is accurate and clearly presented. The histogram is attached in the appendices of the paper.
Determination of Data Distribution
(Normally distributed or skewed)
0 points
A determination of whether the data are normally distributed or skewed according to the bell curve is omitted.
13.2 points
A determination of whether the data are normally distributed or skewed according to the bell curve is included but is incorrect.
14.52 points
NA
15.18 points
NA
16.5 points
A determination of whether the data are normally distributed or skewed according to the bell curve is clearly presented and accurate.
SPSS Statistical Output
Statistical output attached is in appendices of paper.
0 points
Output from the statistical analysis is not included.
17.6 points
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE DNP 830 Week 3 Part 1 Assignment: Working With Descriptive Statistics HERE
Output from the statistical analysis is incomplete or incorrect. The SPSS output is included but is not attached in the appendices of the paper.
19.36 points
NA
20.24 points
NA
22 points
The SPSS statistical analysis output is complete and correct. The SPSS output is attached in the appendices of the paper.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose
Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
4.4 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.
4.84 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
5.06 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
5.5 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion
Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points
No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.
4.4 points
Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.
4.84 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
5.06 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
5.5 points
The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
Evidence
Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.
0 points
Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.
4.4 points
Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
4.84 points
Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
5.06 points
Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.
5.5 points
Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
7.04 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
7.74 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
8.1 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
8.8 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Format/Documentation
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
6.16 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
6.78 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
7.08 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
7.7 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
FEEDBACK ON ORDER