NUR 631 Assignment: Gastrointestinal Case Study PowerPoint

Assessment Description

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

Working in teams and collaboration is an essential skill that is prevalent in clinical situations. Each learner is responsible for participation within the CLC group. The CLC group is responsible for developing a cohesive presentation that flows smoothly. The instructor will monitor the CLC Discussion Forum. One member of the group will submit the assignment to the instructor.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 631 Assignment: Gastrointestinal Case Study PowerPoint HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

In this assignment, you will be working in a group to create a PowerPoint to address the Gastrointestinal Case Study provided below. The PowerPoint presentation should be 10-15 slides and contain speaker notes that expand upon the material in the slides. Include citations and references for all sources used. Review the case study provided and address the following requirements.

Gastrointestinal Case Study

A patient presents in the ER with a severely low hemoglobin and hematocrit count. Symptomatology includes listlessness, pale, pallor, and hypotensive. The initial assumption is blood loss via the gastrointestinal tract. As either an FNP or an AGACNP learner, provide an initial evaluation for either a pediatric or an adult patient. In addition, include the following in your presentation:

The presentation of the patient.

A list of possible conditions that present similarly based on the patient’s symptoms.

A list of treatment modalities.

A rationale explaining the possible conditions.

A rationale explaining the treatment.

You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

CLC – Gastrointestinal Case Study PowerPoint – Rubric

Rubric Criteria

Total 50 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Presentation of the Patient

Presentation of the Patient
0 points

Presentation of the patient is not included.

2.5 points

Presentation of the patient is insufficiently developed. Reasoning is vague or support is unfocused or missing.

4 points

Presentation of the patient is at a perfunctory level. Support for reasoning is present.

4.5 points

Presentation of the patient is present, and reasoning is clearly supported.
5 points

Exemplary presentation of the patient is included. Reasoning is clearly supported and relates directly to case study.

Patient Conditions

0 points

The conditions of the patient are not included.

3.75 points

The conditions of the patient are insufficiently developed. Reasoning is vague or support is unfocused or missing.

6 points

The conditions of the patient are listed at a perfunctory level. Support for reasoning is present.

6.75 points

An adequate list of the conditions of the patient is included, and reasoning is clearly supported.

7.5 points

An exemplary list of the conditions of the patient is provided. Reasoning is clearly supported and relates directly to case study.

Treatment Modalities

0 points

Treatment modalities are not included.
3.75 points

Treatment modalities are insufficiently developed.
6 points

Treatment modalities are identified at a perfunctory level.
6.75 points

Treatment modalities are effectively determined.

7.5 points

Treatment modalities are exceptionally determined and relate directly to case study.

Condition Rationale

0 points

A rationale of the possible conditions is not included.
5 points

A rationale of the possible conditions is insufficiently developed or incomplete.
8 points

A rationale of the possible conditions is outlined at a perfunctory level. Inaccurate information is present.

9 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NUR 631 Assignment: Gastrointestinal Case Study PowerPoint HERE

A rationale of the possible conditions is clear, and accurate information is present.
10 points

An exemplary rationale of the possible conditions is clear, and accurate information is present. Relates directly to case study.

Treatment Rationale

Treatment Rationale
0 points

A rationale of the treatment is not included.
3.75 points

A rationale of the treatment is insufficiently developed or incomplete.

6 points

A rationale of the treatment is outlined at a perfunctory level. Inaccurate information is present.

6.75 points

A rationale of the treatment is clear, and accurate information is present.

7.5 points

An exemplary rationale of the treatment is clear, and accurate information relates directly to case study.

Required Sources

0 points

Sources are not included.
1.25 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.
2 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
2.25 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
2.5 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Presentation of Content

Presentation of Content
0 points

Content lacks a clear point of view or logical sequence of information. Little persuasive information is included. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

1 points

Content is vague in conveying a point of view or does not create a strong sense of purpose. Some persuasive information is included.
1.6 points

Presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.
1.8 points

Content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Persuasive information from reliable sources is included.
2 points

Content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

Layout

Layout
0 points

Layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read, with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

1 points

Layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting, with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1.6 points

Layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts from or does not enhance readability.
1.8 points

Layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

2 points

Layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

Language Use and Audience Awareness

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

1 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
1.6 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

1.8 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

2 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

Mechanics of Writing

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
1 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

1.6 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
1.8 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

2 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.
1 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1.6 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
1.8 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
2 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

NUR 631 Assignment: Gastrointestinal Case Study PowerPoint