NURS 8002 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING PRACTICE
NURS 8002 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING PRACTICE
For this first course Discussion, you will present a philosophy of nursing practice that draws on your experience, area(s) of expertise, and beliefs. Looking ahead to your role as a DNP, also consider how to expand your awareness of issues beyond your own current practice—such as regarding diversity, global health, collaboration—and how to fulfill the Walden requirement to advocate for social change.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 8002 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING PRACTICE HERE
Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!
In short, begin now to commit to a higher level of contribution and practice as a DNP and to reflect that commitment in your philosophy of nursing practice for today and the future. As you continue through the course, note this image will appear with each Discussion and indicates an opportunity to connect your thinking with that of colleagues, for learning with and from one another.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
TO PREPARE:
- Review the Week 1 Learning Resources. Pay particular attention to the Chapter 1 reading from McEwen and Wills, “Philosophy, Science, and Nursing.”
- Reflect on your nursing experience, expertise you have developed, and beliefs about nursing and nursing practice you have formed as a result.
- Consider how your philosophy of nursing practice is shaped by these elements.
- Consider goals for expanding your professional awareness through the DNP program and the requirement as a Walden student to be an advocate for social change. How can your philosophy of nursing practice support you in these areas? How can these goals and Walden social change requirement enrich your philosophy of nursing practice?
With these thoughts in mind …
BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 1
Post an explanation of your philosophy of nursing practice that briefly describes your nursing experience and area(s) of expertise. Be sure to explain your beliefs that inform your philosophy of nursing practice and your goals for expanding your experience and practice as a DNP (e.g., embrace of diversity, global health issues, collaboration). Then, explain the DNP role as a social change agent and recommend at least one way you will advocate for positive social change as a Walden DNP. Be specific and provide examples, with all citations in APA 7 style.
ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NURS 8002 WEEK 7 DISCUSSION: PHILOSOPHY OF NURSING PRACTICE HERE
| NURS_8002_Week7_Blog_Rubric | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| Main Posting:Response to the Blog prompt is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
view longer description |
20 to >17 pts
Excellent 90%–100% Thoroughly responds to the Blog prompt(s). … Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences. … No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. 17 to >15 pts Good 80%–89% Responds to most of the Blog prompt(s). … Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences. … 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. 15 to >13 pts Fair 70%–79% Responds to some of the Blog prompt(s). … One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 13 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Does not respond to the Blog prompt(s). … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. |
20 / 20 pts |
| Main Posting:Writing
view longer description |
5 to >4 pts
Excellent 90%–100% Written clearly and concisely. … Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. … Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Written concisely. … May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. … Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Written somewhat concisely. … May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. Comments Review APA and correct capitalization. |
3 / 5 pts |
| Main Posting:Timely and full participation
view longer description |
5 to >4 pts
Excellent 90%–100% Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts main Blog post by due date. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Posts main Discussion by due date. … Meets requirements for full participation. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Posts main Blog post by due date. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not post main Blog post by due date. |
5 / 5 pts |
| First Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective.
view longer description |
5 to >4 pts
Excellent 90%–100% Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Responds to questions posed by faculty. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Response is on topic and may have some depth. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
5 / 5 pts |
| First Response:Writing
view longer description |
5 to >4 pts
Excellent 90%–100% Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed. … Provides opinions and ideas. … Response is written in standard, edited English. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication. … Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication. … Response to faculty questions is missing. Comments Please see APA for the correct number of authors to be cited. |
4 / 5 pts |
| First Response:Timely and full participation
view longer description |
5 to >4 pts
Excellent 90%–100% Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts by due date. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Meets requirements for full participation. … Posts by due date. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Posts by due date. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not post by due date. |
5 / 5 pts |
| Second Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective.
view longer description |
5 to >4 pts
Excellent 90%–100% Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Responds to questions posed by faculty. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Response is on topic and may have some depth. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
5 / 5 pts |
| Second Response:Writing
view longer description |
5 to >4 pts
Excellent 90%–100% Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. … Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed. … Provides opinions and ideas. … Response is written in standard, edited English. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication. … Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication. … Response to faculty questions is missing. Comments Please see APA for correct format (reference and abbreviation). Please review capitalization format. |
4 / 5 pts |
| Second Response:Timely and full participation
view longer description |
5 to >4 pts
Excellent 90%–100% Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. … Posts by due date. 4 to >3 pts Good 80%–89% Meets requirements for full participation. … Posts by due date. 3 to >2 pts Fair 70%–79% Posts by due date. 2 to >0 pts Poor 0%–69% Does not meet requirements for full participation. … Does not pos |
|