PRAC 6645 WEEK 7 ASSIGNMENT 2: COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION NOTE AND PATIENT CASE PRESENTATION, PART 2

PRAC 6645 WEEK 7 ASSIGNMENT 2: COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION NOTE AND PATIENT CASE PRESENTATION, PART 2

PRAC 6645 WEEK 7 ASSIGNMENT 2: COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION NOTE AND PATIENT CASE PRESENTATION, PART 2

Psychiatric notes are a way to reflect on your practicum experiences and connect the experiences to the learning you gain from your weekly Learning Resources. Comprehensive psychiatric evaluation notes, such as the ones required in this practicum course, are often used in clinical settings to document patient care.

For this Assignment, you will document information about a patient that you examined at your practicum site, using the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note Template provided. You will then use this note to develop and record a case presentation for this patient.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PRAC 6645 WEEK 7 ASSIGNMENT 2: COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATION NOTE AND PATIENT CASE PRESENTATION, PART 2 HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

TO PREPARE

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about impulse-control and conduct disorders.
  • Select a patient for whom you conducted psychotherapy for an impulse control or conduct disorderduring the last 6 weeks. Create a Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Note on this patient using the template provided in the Learning Resources. There is also a completed template provided as an exemplar and guide. All psychiatric evaluation notes must be signed by your Preceptor. When you submit your note, you should include the complete comprehensive evaluation note as a Word document and pdf/images of the completed assignment signed by your Preceptor. You must submit your note using Turnitin.

PRAC_6645_Week7_Assignment2_PT2_Rubric

PRAC_6645_Week7_Assignment2_PT2_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflections on this case.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking. … Reflections contain all 3 elements from the assignment directions including a discussion demonstrating critical thinking of the case related to the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. Clearly and concisely relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field.

 4 to >3.5 pts

Good

Reflections demonstrate critical thinking. … Reflections demonstrate critical thinking. … Reflections contain 2 of the elements from the assignment directions with one being a basic discussion of the case related to the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. Clearly relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field.

 3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair

Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking. … Reflections contain 1 of the required elements from the assignment directions which is the HealthyPeople 2030 social health determinates. … Somewhat vaguely or inaccurately relates discussion to the psychiatric and mental health field.

 3 to >0 pts

Poor

Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing. … There are no Reflections elements from the assignment directions (no HeathlyPeople 2030 social health determinates, no health promotion, and no education activity). … Missing discussion relating to the psychiatric and mental health field or relates discussion to another specialty realm including medical co-morbidity illnesses.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeComprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation documentation
20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent

The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Preceptor signature and date pdf/image is uploaded on the completed assignment (not an electronic signature).

 17 to >15.0 pts

Good

The response accurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. Preceptor signature and date pdf/image is uploaded on the completed assignment but is an electronic signature.

 15 to >13.0 pts

Fair

The response follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case, with some vagueness and inaccuracy Preceptor signature and date pdf/image is uploaded on the completed assignment but is an electronic signature.

 13 to >0 pts

Poor

The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation format to document the selected patient case. No preceptor signature.
20 pts
Total Points: 25

PreviousNext