Assignment: Benchmark - Electronic Health Record Implementation

Assignment: Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation

Assessment Description

One way informatics can be especially valuable is in capturing data to inspire improvements and quality change in practice. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) collects data related to adverse events and safety concerns. If you are working within a practice setting to implement a new electronic health record (EHR) system, this is just one of the many considerations your team would need to plan for during the rollout process.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation
HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

In a paper of 1,500-1,750 words, discuss the following:

Consider an opportunity for tracking care improvement. What key information would be needed in the database? Example: Time lapse from medication order documented in the EHR to delivery of medication to the patient for the cardiology service.

Describe the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data. What type of project management strategies and methodologies can be implemented to support informatics initiatives to help improve quality within the clinical practice?

Discuss which systems and staff members would need to be involved in the design and implementation process. What is the role of the advanced registered nurse in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting?

Outline strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal. Consider communication changes, transitioning to the new EHR, and managing resources (human, fiscal, and health care resources).

Discuss what professional, ethical, and regulatory standards must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system.

Describe the measures and steps you would take to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice?

Explain what leadership skills and theories would be needed to facilitate collaboration with the interprofessional team and provide evidence-based, patient-centered care?

You are required to cite five to 10 sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing

2.3: Develop leadership skills to collaborate on interprofessional teams in the provision of evidence-based, patient-centered care.

5.2: Apply professional, ethical, and regulatory standards of practice in the provision of safe, effective health care.

Attachments

MSN-APA Writing Checklist-Student.docx

Skip to main contentEnable accessibility for visually impairedOpen the accessibility menuOpen the Accessible Navigation Menu

Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation Paper – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total210 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Insufficient

3. Approaching

4. Acceptable

5. Target

Opportunity for Tracking Care Improvement

0 points

Opportunity for tracking care improvement is not discussed.

16.8 points

Opportunity for tracking care improvement is only partially discussed.
18.48 points

Opportunity for tracking care improvement is generally discussed. Some key information needed for the database is summarized.
19.32 points

Opportunity for tracking care improvement is discussed. Key information needed for the database is presented.

21 points

Opportunity for tracking care improvement is thoroughly discussed. Key information needed for the database is accurate and clearly presented. The narrative provides insight and is well supported.

Role Informatics Plays in Ability to Capture Data

Role Informatics Plays in Ability to Capture Data
0 points

The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is omitted.

11.76 points

The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is only partially discussed.
12.94 points

The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is summarized. Some general project management strategies and methodologies to implement and support informatics initiatives and help improve quality within the clinical practice are presented.

13.52 points

The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is described. Project management strategies and methodologies to implement and support informatics initiatives and help improve quality within the clinical practice are presented.
14.7 points

The role informatics plays in the ability to capture specified data is clearly described. Project management strategies and methodologies to implement and support informatics initiatives and help improve quality within the clinical practice are discussed. The narrative is insightful and well supported.

Systems and Staff Members Needed in Design and Implementation Process

Systems and Staff Members Needed in Design and Implementation Process
0 points

Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process are omitted.

13.44 points

Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process only partially discussed.
14.78 points

Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process are generally discussed. The general role of the advanced registered nurse in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting is summarized.
15.46 points

Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process are discussed. The role of the advanced registered nurse in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting is discussed.
16.8 points

Systems and staff members needed in the design and implementation process are detailed. The role of the advanced registered nurse in promoting evidence-based practice and leading quality and performance improvement initiatives within this setting is thoroughly discussed. The narrative is well developed and demonstrates a clear understanding of the design and implementation process.

Outline Strategies for Implementing EHR Proposal

Outline Strategies for Implementing EHR Proposal
0 points

Strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are omitted.
16.8 points

Strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are only partially discussed.
18.48 points

General strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are presented. Some general communication changes, transitioning to the new EHR and managing human, fiscal, and health care resources, are summarized.
19.32 points

Strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are outlined. Communication changes, transitioning to the new EHR and managing human, fiscal, and health care resources, are generally discussed.
21 points

Strategies for implementing the new EHR proposal are detailed. Communication changes, transitioning to the new EHR and managing human, fiscal, and health care resources, are thoroughly discussed.

Professional, Ethical, and Regulatory Standards Implementation (B)

Professional, Ethical, and Regulatory Standards Implementation (C5.2)

0 points

A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is not included.
16.8 points

A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is incomplete or incorrect.

18.48 points

A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is included but lacks supporting detail.
19.32 points

A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is complete and includes supporting detail.
21 points

A description of the professional, ethical, and regulatory standards used to design and implement the plan is extremely thorough and includes substantial details.

Evaluation of the Success of EHR Implementation

0 points

Measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are omitted.
16.8 points

General measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are summarized.
19.32 points

Overall, measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are discussed.
21 points

Clear measures and steps needed to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective to measure effectiveness and ensure continuous quality improvement in practice are detailed. The proposed evaluation measures are effective measures and relevant for the EHR implementation.

Leadership Skills and Project Management to Collaborate With Interprofessional Teams (B)

Leadership Skills and Project Management to Collaborate With Interprofessional Teams (C2.3)

0 points

A description of the leadership skills and project management knowledge used to collaborate with the interprofessional team and ensure the facility is providing evidence-based care is not included.
16.8 points

18.48 points

19.32 points

21 points

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation
HERE

Required Sources

Required Sources
0 points

Sources are not included.
5.04 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.
5.54 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

5.8 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
6.3 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Appendix

Appendix
0 points

The appendix and APA Writing Checklist are omitted.
3.36 points

The APA Writing Checklist is attached, but an appendix has not been created. The paper does not reflect the use of the use of the APA Writing Checklist during development.

3.7 points

The APA Writing Checklist is complete and attached in the appendix. The APA Writing Checklist was generally used in development of the paper, but some aspects are inconsistent with the paper format or quality.

3.86 points

The APA Writing Checklist is complete and attached in the appendix. It is apparent that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development of the paper.

4.2 points

The APA Writing Checklist is complete and attached in the appendix. It is clearly evident by the quality of the paper that the APA Writing Checklist was used in development.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.
0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.
11.76 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

12.94 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.
13.52 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.
14.7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.

Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Development, Structure, and Conclusion Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.
0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

13.44 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

14.78 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

15.46 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
16.8 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

Evidence

Evidence Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

8.4 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.
9.24 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.
9.66 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.
10.5 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
8.4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
9.24 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
9.66 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

10.5 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.

Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

8.4 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
9.24 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
9.66 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
10.5 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.

Assignment: Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation