Assignment: NRNP 6568 Week 3 Study Plan

Assignment: NRNP 6568 Week 3 Study Plan

Assignment: NRNP 6568 Week 3 Study Plan

Study Plan

Based on your practice exam question results, identify strengths and areas of opportunity and create a tailored study plan to use throughout this course to help you prepare for the national certification exam. This will serve as an action plan to help you track your goals, tasks, and progress.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: NRNP 6568 Week 3 Study Plan HERE

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.

Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Leik, M. T. C. (2021). Family nurse practitioner certification intensive review (4th ed.). Springer Publishing Company.

Ch. 5, Head Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat Review

Buppert, C. (2021). Nurse practitioner’s business practice and legal guide (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.

Appendix 4-A “Ear, Nose, Mouth, and Throat Examination” (pp. 191–192)

Note: The textbook listed below is from NRNP 6531. Review the chapters assigned in this textbook as needed to refresh your knowledge.

Buttaro, T. M., Polgar-Bailey, P., Sandberg-Cook, J., & Trybulski, J. (2021). Primary care: Interprofessional collaborative practice (6th ed.). Elsevier.

Note: Review the following chapters, as needed.

Ch. 52, Evaluation of the Eyes

Ch. 53, Cataracts

Ch. 54, Blepharitis, Hordeolum, and Chalazion

Ch. 55, Conjunctivitis

Ch. 56, Corneal Surface Defects and Ocular Surface Foreign Bodies

Ch. 57, Dry Eye Syndrome

Ch. 58, Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction and Dacryocystitis

Ch. 59, Preseptal and Orbital Cellulitis

Ch. 60, Pingueculae and Pterygia

Ch. 61, Traumatic Ocular Disorders

Ch. 62, Auricular Disorders

Ch. 63, Cerumen Impaction

Ch. 64, Cholesteatoma

Ch. 65, Impaired Hearing

Ch. 66, Inner Ear Disturbances

Ch. 67, Otitis Externa

Ch. 68, Otitis Media

Ch. 69, Tympanic Membrane Perforation

Ch. 70, Chronic Nasal Congestion and Discharge

Ch. 71, Epistaxis

Ch. 72, Nasal Trauma

Ch. 73, Rhinitis

Ch. 74, Sinusitis

Ch. 75, Smell and Taste Disturbances

Ch. 76, Tumors and Polyps of the Nose

Ch. 77, Dental Abscess

Ch. 78, Diseases of the Salivary Gland

Ch. 79, Epiglottitis

Ch. 80, Oral Infections

Ch. 81, Peritonsillar Abscess

Ch. 82, Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis

Document: Focused SOAP Note Template (Word document)

Download Focused SOAP Note Template (Word document)

Required Media

HEENT Review

In this video, Dr. Jodi Duncan reviews important considerations when assessing, diagnosing, and treating patients with HEENT conditions. (18 min)

Optional Resources

Adult HEENT

Dr. Stefanie Gatica discusses how to listen to the patient and what to look for as you assess your patient. (25m)

To Prepare:

Reflect on your practice exam results. Identify content-area strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Also reflect on your overall test-taking. Was the length of time allotted comfortable or did you run out of time? Did a particular question format prove difficult?

The Assignment:

Summarize your practice exam results, including your strengths and opportunities for improvement.

Note: Your grade for this Assignment will not be derived from your test results but from your self-reflection and study plan.

Create a study plan, including 3–4 specific goals and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal.

Include a timetable on a calendar template for accomplishing the goals and tasks and add a description of how you will measure your progress.

Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, mnemonics and other mental strategies, and print or online resources you could use to study.

By Day 7

Submit your study plan with calendar.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK3Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial

Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.

Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Rubric

NRNP_6568_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric

NRNP_6568_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Complete the practice exam from your certification exam review text. Based on your results and considering the National Certification Exam, summarize your strengths and opportunities for improvement.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE Assignment: NRNP 6568 Week 3 Study Plan HERE

The response provides an accurate, clear, and complete summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response provides an accurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response provides a vague and/or inaccurate summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement.

20 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

A summary of both the strengths and opportunities for improvement is incomplete or missing.
30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Create a study plan, including specific goals and the tasks you need to complete to accomplish each goal. Include a timetable for accomplishing them and a description of how you will measure your progress.

35 to >31.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response provides 3–4 clear and appropriate goals for the study plan, including tasks to complete to accomplish each goal. A clear timeline is provided for the study plan as well as a description of how progress toward goal completion will be measured.

31 to >27.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response provides 3–4 appropriate goals and objectives for the practicum experience. Appropriate tasks, timeline, and description of how progress will be measured is provided.

27 to >24.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response provides 3–4 vague or general goals for the study plan. Tasks, timeline, and description of how progress toward goals will be measured are vague or somewhat inappropriate.

24 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response provides 3–4 unclear or inappropriate goals for the study plan, or goals are missing. Tasks, timeline, and a description for how progress will be measured is incomplete or missing.

35 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Describe resources you would use to accomplish your goals and tasks, such as ways to participate in a study group or review course, and print or online resources you could use to study.
20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

The response provides a clear description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are tailored to individual need.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good 80%–89%

The response provides a description of appropriate resources to support the study plan that are somewhat tailored to individual need.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

The response provides a description of general resources that are not tailored to individual need.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

The response provides a description of inappropriate resources to support the study plan, or the description of resources is vague or missing.
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%

Contains 1 or 2 APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%

Contains many (≥5) APA format errors.
5 pts

Total Points: 100