NRS 430V Topic 3: Nursing History, Theories, And Conceptual Models

NRS 430V Topic 3: Nursing History, Theories, And Conceptual Models

NRS 430V Topic 3: Nursing History, Theories, And Conceptual Models

Mar 14-20, 2022

Max Points:198

Objectives:

  1. Describe how historical events and nursing leaders have influenced the practice of nursing.
  2. Evaluate the use of nursing theory in nursing practice.
  3. Evaluate the use of conceptual models in nursing practice.

Topic 3 DQ 1

Start Date

Mar 14, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 16, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points

8

Status

Published

Assessment Description

How has nursing practice evolved over time? Discuss the key leaders and historical events that have influenced the advancement of nursing, nursing education, and nursing roles that are now part of the contemporary nursing profession.

Amber Chavez

Posted Date

Mar 16, 2022, 10:31 PM

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

Unread

Replies to Amber Chavez

The Nursing Practice has evolved significantly over the years. I remember learning about Florence Nightingale during my first semester of nursing school. I thought it was amazing that a woman in the late 1830’s was called, by God, into service and had the ability to make such a huge impact on the profession and nursing as we know it to this day. According to Dynamics in Nursing, “at the time, British hospitals for soldiers did not employ female nurses, she was assigned to be the chief nurse of the hospital in Turkey” (Whitney, S.). Something as simple as handwashing and keeping sanitary conditions, hugely impacted care and outcomes of soldiers. Technology has impacted nursing. Paper charts made it very difficult for healthcare teams to get on the same level because only one person could view the chart at a time. It would take longer for doctors to see labs. Medications that were not compatible were not easily flagged on a computer screen. IV poles could not monitor the flow of medication administration. Medicine will continue to evolve and in 10 years from now we will have unimaginable advances in healthcare.  NRS 430V Topic 3: Nursing History, Theories, And Conceptual Models

Whitney, S. Dynamics in Nursing Art & Science of Professional Practice. Chapter 2. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs430v/dynamics-in-nursing-art-and-science-of-professional-practice/v1.1/#/chapter/2

Topic 3 DQ 2

GO TO DISCUSSION

Start Date

Mar 14, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 18, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points

8

Status

Published

Assessment Description

Discuss the difference between a nursing conceptual model and a nursing theory.

Select a nursing theory and provide a concise summary of it. Provide an example in nursing practice where the nursing theory you selected would be effective in managing patient care.

Deisy Hernandez

Posted Date

Mar 18, 2022, 10:34 PM

Unread

Replies to Deisy Hernandez

 In the article, “Using a conceptual model in nursing research-mitigating fatigue in cancer patients” it talks about how these two terms may be used interchangeably, however, a nursing theory will use part of a specific theory to use as the basis of the study. It includes statements where recommendations are made and it shows how the theory is proved or relevant, more so than a conceptual model would. A conceptual model would be considered more so of the organization for the framework of the actual research.

The nursing theory I would like to summarize is the Self-care theory by Dorothea E. Orem. This theory speaks of helping a patient preserve their autonomy when this becomes difficult after having a sickness or being affected by other life changing events. This is meant to help a patient continue having a good quality of life, stability and function on their own. I believe a good example would be with a patient that lost a limb. This patient would most likely want to initially depend on others to help with tasks because they are either scared or simply unfamiliar with what it would entail to live with, say, just one arm. Providing assistance and teaching these patients how to do these tasks one handed, how to get dressed, do self-care such as brushing their teeth or taking a shower, little things that will help them commence their independence are all effective.

References

Kim, H. S. P. R., & Kollak, I. P. R. (2005). Nursing theories : Conceptual and philosophical foundations, second edition. Springer Publishing Company. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/lib/gcu/reader.action?docID=291336

Mock, V., St Ours, C., Hall, S., Bositis, A., Tillery, M., Belcher, A., Krumm, S., & McCorkle, R. (2007). Using a conceptual model in nursing research–mitigating fatigue in cancer patients. Journal of advanced nursing, 58(5), 503–512. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2505113/?viewType=Print&viewClass=Print

CLC – Nursing Theory and Conceptual Model Presentation

GO TO GROUP

Start Date

Mar 14, 2022, 12:00 AM

Due Date

Mar 20, 2022, 11:59 PM

Points

150

Rubric

View Rubric

Status

Published

Assessment Traits

Group

Requires Lopeswrite

Assessment Description

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

This assignment is to be completed in a group, which will be assigned by your instructor. The presentation will be submitted and graded as a group assignment.

Nursing theories are tested and systematic ways to implement nursing practice. Select a nursing theory and its conceptual model. Prepare a 10‐15 slide PowerPoint in which you describe the nursing theory and its conceptual model and demonstrate its application in nursing practice. Include the following:

  1. Present an overview of the nursing theory. Provide evidence that demonstrates support for the model’s efficacy in nursing practice. Explain how the theory proves the conceptual model.
  2. Explain how the nursing theory incorporates the four metaparadigm concepts.
  3. Provide three evidence‐based examples that demonstrate how the nursing theory supports nursing practice. Provide support and rationale for each.

You are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be appropriate for the assignment and relevant to nursing practice.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style. NRS 430V Topic 3: Nursing History, Theories, And Conceptual Models

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

CLC – Nursing Theory and Conceptual Model Presentation – Rubric

Collapse All CLC – Nursing Theory And Conceptual Model Presentation – RubricCollapse All

Overview of Nursing Theory and Evidence for Efficacy of Model in Practice

22.5 points

Criteria Description

Overview of Nursing Theory and Evidence for Efficacy of Model in Practice

  1. Excellent

22.5 points

A detailed overview of the nursing theory is presented. Support for the efficacy of the model in nursing practice is strongly demonstrated. A detailed explanation of how the theory proves the conceptual model is presented.

  1. Good

20.03 points

An overview of the nursing theory is presented. Support for the efficacy of the model in nursing practice is presented. An explanation of how the theory proves the conceptual model is presented. There are minor inaccuracies. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.

  1. Satisfactory

17.78 points

A summary of the nursing theory is presented. General support for the efficacy of the model in nursing practice is presented, but more evidence is needed for support. A general explanation of how the theory proves the conceptual model is presented. There are some inaccuracies.

  1. Less than Satisfactory

16.88 points

A partial overview of the nursing theory is presented. Support for the efficacy of the model in nursing practice is not illustrated; or, evidence provided is not relevant. An unsupported explanation of how the theory proves the conceptual model is presented. There are significant inaccuracies. More information is needed

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Overview of the nursing theory is not presented. Demonstration for support of the efficacy of the model in nursing practice is omitted. An explanation of how the theory proves the conceptual model is not presented.

Incorporation of Four Metaparadigm Concepts Into Nursing Theory

15 points

Criteria Description

Incorporation of Four Metaparadigm Concepts Into Nursing Theory

  1. Excellent

15 points

A through explanation of how the nursing theory incorporates the four metaparadigm concepts is presented. Compelling evidence is provided for support.

  1. Good

13.35 points

An explanation of how the nursing theory incorporates the four metaparadigm concepts is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity. Overall, the explanation provides sound support.

  1. Satisfactory

11.85 points

A summary of how the nursing theory incorporates the four metaparadigm concepts is presented. There are some inaccuracies. More information or detail is needed.

  1. Less than Satisfactory

11.25 points

A partial explanation of how the nursing theory incorporates the four metaparadigm concepts is presented. There are inaccuracies. More information is needed.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Explanation of how the nursing theory incorporates the four metaparadigm concepts is omitted.

Evidence-Based Examples to Demonstrate That the Nursing Theory Supports Nursing Practice

22.5 points

Criteria Description

Evidence-Based Examples to Demonstrate That the Nursing Theory Supports Nursing Practice

  1. Excellent

22.5 points

Three evidence-based examples are provided. The examples are relevant and clearly demonstrate how the nursing theory supports nursing practice. Strong rationale and evidence are offered that demonstrate support for each example.

  1. Good

20.03 points

Three evidence-based examples are provided. Overall, the examples are relevant and demonstrate how the nursing theory supports nursing practice. Some additional evidence or rationale is required to fully demonstrate support.

  1. Satisfactory

17.78 points

Three examples are provided. At least two examples are evidence-based. The examples provided generally demonstrate how the nursing theory supports nursing practice. More relevant examples are needed.

  1. Less than Satisfactory

16.88 points

Only one or two examples are provided. Only one example is evidence-based. The examples provided do not fully demonstrate how the nursing theory supports nursing practice.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

No examples are provided to demonstrate how the nursing theory supports nursing practice. The three examples used are not evidence-based, or they do not demonstrate how the nursing theory supports nursing practice.

Presentation of Content

60 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

  1. Excellent

60 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

  1. Good

53.4 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Persuasive information from reliable sources is included.

  1. Satisfactory

47.4 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

  1. Less than Satisfactory

45 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Some persuasive information is included.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Little persuasive information is included. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

Layout

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Layout

  1. Excellent

7.5 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

  1. Good

6.68 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

  1. Satisfactory

5.93 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

  1. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

  1. Excellent

7.5 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

  1. Good

6.68 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

  1. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

  1. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

  1. Excellent

7.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

  1. Good

6.68 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

  1. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

  1. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Documentation of Sources

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

  1. Excellent

7.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

  1. Good

6.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

  1. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

  1. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.