NR 599 Week 5 Assignment: Clinical Decision Support Systems

Clinical Decision Support Systems

Discussion

Purpose

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the discussions guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The ebb and flow of a discussion is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship.

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 599 Week 5 Assignment: Clinical Decision Support Systems HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

Contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a discussion environment that models professional and social interaction (CO4)

Actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty (CO5)

Due Date

Students must post a minimum of 3 times in each graded discussion. The 3 posts in each individual discussion must be on separate days. Posting 3 times on 3 different days meets the minimum requirement for full credit; each post must be substantive. The student must provide an initial post to each graded discussion topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of Week 5. Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur no later than the Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Threaded discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.

A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after the deadline on Wednesday regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0).

Total Points Possible: 150

Preparing the Assignment

Post a written response in the discussion forum to EACH threaded discussion topic:

This week we learned about the potential benefits and drawbacks to clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). Create a “Pros” versus “Cons” table with a column for “Pro” and a separate column for “Con”. Include at least 3 items for each column. Next to each item, provide a brief rationale as to why you included it on the respective list.

The primary goal of a CDSS is to leverage data and the scientific evidence to help guide appropriate decision making. CDSSs directly assist the clinician in making decisions about specific patients. For this discussion thread post, you are to assume your future role as an APN and create a clinical patient and scenario to illustrate an exemplary depiction of how a CDSS might influence your decision. This post is an opportunity for you to be innovative, so have fun!

Adhere to the following guidelines regarding quality for the threaded discussions in Canvas:

Application of Course Knowledge: Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings.

Scholarliness and Scholarly Sources: Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions using valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly source to contribute to the discussion thread.

Writing Mechanics: Grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation are accurate. In-text and reference citations should be formatted using correct APA guidelines.

Direct Quotes: Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the grammar, syntax, APA category.

For each threaded discussion per week, the student will select no less than TWO scholarly sources to support the initial discussion post.

Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.

DISCUSSION CONTENT

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 599 Week 5 Assignment: Clinical Decision Support Systems HERE

Must demonstrate the following elements:

• Discussion posts are supported with appropriate, scholarly sources

• Provided relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions

• Evaluated literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis

• Sources were published within the last 5 years;

• Reference list was provided and in-text citations match

• Threaded discussion posts contains no more than 1 direct quote (if quote is used it contains <15 words and adds substantively to the reflection)

(6 Required Elements)

40 pts

Excellent

Demonstrates all elements for the Criterion

36 pts

V. Good

Missing 1 element for the Criterion

34 pts

Satisfactory

Missing 2 elements for the Criterion

20 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing 3 elements for the Criterion

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing 4 or more elements for the Criterion Or No Discussion Thread

40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInteractive Dialogue

Must demonstrate the following elements:

• Must interact with more than one initial post

• Responses to peer/faculty were substantive (adds importance, depth, and meaningfulness to the discussion)

• Provided scholarly source for each post

• Responded to all direct questions from faculty (if no question asked directly, student responded to questions posed to the entire class)

(4 Required Elements)
40 pts

Excellent

Demonstrates all elements for the Criterion

36 pts

V. Good

Missing 1 element for the Criterion

34 pts

Satisfactory

Missing 2 elements for the Criterion

20 pts

Needs Improvement

Missing 3 elements for the Criterion

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Missing 4 or more elements for the Criterion Or No Discussion Thread

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format

20 pts

Excellent

0-1 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format

18 pts

V. Good

2-3 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format

16 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format

10 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

8 or more errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format Or No Discussion Thread
20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeParticipation
0 pts

Discussion late penalty deductions

0 pts

Total Participation Responses

A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on the minimum required number of days: 3 days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59pm MT on Sunday (i.e. student will receive an automatic 0)
0 pts

Total Points: 150

NR 599 Week 5 Assignment: Clinical Decision Support Systems