NR 501 Week 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography

NR 501 Week 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography

NR 501 Week 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography

Assignment

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to review current and historical literature related to theories important to the nurse practitioner’s role. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected theories as well as application within the profession.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 501 Week 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography HERE

Thanks for stopping by this assessment. We can assist you in completing it and other subsequent ones. Our expert writers will comprehensively review instructions, synthesize external evidence sources, and customize an A-grade paper for YOU!!!

CO 3: Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO 2, 5)

CO 4: Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationship among the components, and the application to advanced nursing practice. (PO 1)

Due Date

Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 5. Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with a penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

Total Points Possible

This assignment is worth 200 points.

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

An annotated bibliography is an alphabetical list of information sources (such as journal articles), formatted like a bibliography or a reference list, accompanied by a commentary, or annotation, for each source. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to learn about a topic through a critical review of literature and encourage a deeper engagement with literature to develop analytical skills.

This assignment presents a method for examining several theories important and useful to the nurse practitioner role.

Preparing the Assignment

  1. For this assignment, you will use the five theories/models listed below:
  2. Search the library for literature. Locate one article related to each selected theory or model.
    • Use only scholarly sources as defined for the NP program: A US-based peer-reviewed journal for clinicians (MD/DO/NP/PA) published in the past five years or the latest clinical practice guideline (CPG).
  3. Prepare an annotated entry for each source. Begin with the full APA citation of the source, followed by 2-3 paragraphs:
    • Summarize the article.
    • Describe how the article relates to the chosen theory/model.
    • Reflect on how the article could (or could not) be relevant to future Nurse Practitioner practice.

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. The paper should not include a separate title page. No reference page is necessary as it will incorporate the references into the body of the bibliography.
  2. The template must be used for this assignment: NR501NP Week 5 Assignment TemplateLinks to an external site..
  3. A minimum of 5 (five) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.
  4. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.
  5. In-text citations are not required in the annotated bibliography.
  6. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

    ORDER A CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE NR 501 Week 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography HERE

ASSIGNMENT CONTENT 
Category Points % Description
Quantity of Sources 15 7.5% The annotated bibliography contains at least 5 sources.
Quality of Sources 20 10% The annotated bibliography contains at least 5 sources.
Recency of Sources 15 7.5% All sources are published within 5 years; if older, permission to use obtained and historical significance explained
Summary of Annotations 40 20% Annotations comprehensively describe source material, clearly conveying main ideas.
Relation to Theory/Model 40 20% Annotations contain a clear description on how the source relates to the theory/model
Reflection 40 20% Annotations contain a clear reflection of the relevance of the source material to future practice.
Total CONTENT Points= [170 pts]
ASSIGNMENT FORMAT 
Category Points % Description
Assignment Specifications 10 5% Annotated bibliography format utilized as described in the current edition of the APA manual.
APA Format (current edition) 10 5% References must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. One deduction for each type of APA style error.
Writing Mechanics 10 5% Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual.
Total FORMAT Points = [30 pts] 
ASSIGNMENT TOTAL = 200 points 

Rubric

NR501NP_Annot_Bib_NOV22

NR501NP_Annot_Bib_NOV22
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuantity of Sources
15 pts

Excellent

5 sources utilized

14 pts

V. Good

4 sources utilized

12 pts

Satisfactory

3 sources utilized

8 pts

Needs Improvement

2 sources utilized

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

1 or fewer sources utilized

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of Sources
20 pts

Excellent

All selected works are from scholarly sources.

18 pts

V. Good

1 selected work is from a non-scholarly source.

17 pts

Satisfactory

2 selected works are from non-scholarly sources.

10 pts

Needs Improvement

3 selected works are from non-scholarly sources.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

4 or more selected works are from non-scholarly sources.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecency of Sources
15 pts

Excellent

All sources are less than 5 years old; if older, permission obtained and historical significance explained.

14 pts

V. Good

1 source older than 5 years old without permission obtained or no explanation of historical significance.

12 pts

Satisfactory

2 sources older than 5 years old without permission obtained or no explanation of historical significance.

8 pts

Needs Improvement

3 sources older than 5 years old without permission obtained or no explanation of historical significance.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

4 or more sources older than 5 years old without permission obtained or no explanation of historical significance.

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of Annotations
40 pts

Excellent

All annotations complete with clear explanation (or description) of source material.

36 pts

V. Good

1 annotation lacked clarity or completeness.

33 pts

Satisfactory

2 annotations lacked clarity or completeness.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

3 annotations lacked clarity or completeness.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

4 or more annotations lacked clarity or completeness.

40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelation to Theory/Model
40 pts

Excellent

All annotations contain a clear description on how the source relates to the theory/model.

36 pts

V. Good

1 annotation lacked a clear description on how the source relates to the theory/model.

33 pts

Satisfactory

2 annotations lacked a clear description on how the source relates to the theory/model.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

3 annotations lacked a clear description on how the source relates to the theory/model.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

4 or more annotations lacked a clear description on how the source relates to the theory/model.

40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection
40 pts

Excellent

All annotations contain a clear reflection of the relevance of the source material to future nursing practice. First person may be utilized.

36 pts

V. Good

1 annotation lacked a clear reflection of the relevance of the source material to future nursing practice. First person may be utilized.

33 pts

Satisfactory

2 annotations lacked a clear reflection of the relevance of the source material to future nursing practice. First person may be utilized.

20 pts

Needs Improvement

3 annotations lacked a clear reflection of the relevance of the source material to future nursing practice. First person may be utilized.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

4 or more annotations lacked a clear reflection of the relevance of the source material to future nursing practice. First person may be utilized.

40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Specifications

Critical elements:
• Annotated bibliography format utilized
• Each theory is used for one annotation
• Template is used for the assignment
• A minimum of five annotations are provided with a maximum of seven annotations.

10 pts

Excellent

This section included all critical elements.

9 pts

V. Good

This section included three of the critical elements.

8 pts

Satisfactory

This section included only two of the critical elements.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

This section included only one of the critical elements.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

This section included none of the critical elements.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style

APA guidelines, as per the current edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the references. One deduction for each type of APA format error.

10 pts

Excellent

0 to 1 APA error was present.

9 pts

V. Good

2-3 APA errors were present.

8 pts

Satisfactory

4-5 APA were present.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

6-7 APA were present.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

8 or greater APA errors were present.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Quality

Submission follows the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the current edition of the APA manual.

10 pts

Excellent

1–2 errors or exceptions were present.

9 pts

V. Good

3-4 errors or exceptions were present.

8 pts

Satisfactory

5-6 errors or exceptions were present.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

7-8 errors or exceptions were present.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

9 or greater errors or exceptions were present.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate penalty deductions

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts

Manual Deductions

0 pts
Total Points: 200